Waterdog (1)

[“Waterdog” is a three-part narrative about a stream remediation project I initiated several years ago as a volunteer, along with the help of land owners, Trout Unlimited (TU) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Now, at this coldest time of year, I find it pleasant to reflect on this fair-weather project OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAundertaken, not to further the fishing interests of anyone involved, but to assist wild brook trout and other wildlife in a headwater area near my home. The project was both challenging and spiritually rewarding. I hope you’ll enjoy this recollection.]

Early June. After weeks of rain, the sun finally dominated the sky. It was time to work on the headwater stream. My long hours of planning and preparation for the job, leading the efforts of my TU chapter, had come to this– a Friday morning with a purpose.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAMy daughter Alyssa was assigned the job of documenting the event with a simple camera. A friend donated morning time and the use of his tractor, the only form of heavy machinery used for the project. He would chain the locust logs that were laid out in the staging area and drag them to the stream sites. Other than that, most of the work was done exclusively by hand, thus minimizing our negative impact on the native trout environment.

Scott C. was the fisheries biologist at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) whose experience with stream remediation projects was enlisted for the site designs. Another dozen volunteers from Trout Unlimited comprised the labor force for Tributary 2 (T-2), a small native brook trout water flowing northward into New York State from the nearby fields and woods of Pennsylvania.OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

When Scott and his assistants started preparatory work at site number 1, the station farthest downstream on the project, I took a smaller crew to site number 4 at the upper end. There were fallen hemlocks in this area of the project and we had already cut several of the trees into logs that needed to be carried off.

Michael P. had been put in charge of cutting and hauling the logs for this project. Most of the wood was locust (hard and rot-resistant) measured into lengths of eight, 10, and 12 feet, with an average diameter of a foot. Mike had cut the logs on a Naples, N.Y. farm, about an hour away, and had hauled them to our place along this rivertop in the Genesee watershed. The logs at site 4 were exceptional, being hemlock wood that saved us from having to haul the locusts upstream into the forest.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAMike and I had prepared a 24-foot log that needed to be pulled downstream from site 4 to site 1 where Scott’s crew was at work. The big log would become a cross-channel piece embedded at an upstream angle. Its open end would abut the ends of two revetment logs along the eastern bank, and each log would be pinned securely with lengths of rebar.

It was reasonable to think that a 24-foot hemlock (one to two-feet thick?) would be easy enough to manage for a group of six workers, including young Alyssa. After all, we were using several log-carriers as tools, and the distance was only three hundred level feet, along with a few stream crossings. But five men and one woman had their hands full and their shoulders slumped with this carry. They felt the ground grow closer to their backs, and sensed the path growing narrower by the minute!OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The long hemlock was eventually installed at a 30-degree angle with its western end embedded one-foot higher than the eastern end. Fiber mat was laid down on its upstream side. Rocks were piled up for a backfill, and stakes of live willow-shrubs were planted at the log ends to encourage new growth.

The stream began to flow across the transverse log, pulling itself toward the east bank where revetment logs would be undercut and give new shelter for the native brook trout. These fish, here and elsewhere throughout their original range in eastern North America, are threatened by dangers such as global warming and habitat destruction, so our job, as I saw it, was to help them out.

The stream began its own work for the trout by scouring a deeper pool at the junction of the logs. The water would become more oxygenated; the silt would be pushed from the stream bed, thus exposing fresh gravel needed for the spawning of trout.

                                                                [to be continued…]OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA




About rivertoprambles

Welcome to Rivertop Rambles. This is my blog about the headwaters country-far afield or close to home. I've been a fly-fisher, birder, and naturalist for most of my adult life. I've also written poetry and natural history books for thirty years. In Rambles I will mostly reflect on the backcountry of my Allegheny foothills in the northern tier of Pennsylvania and the southern tier of New York State. Sometimes I'll write about the wilderness in distant states, or of the wild places in the human soul. Other times I'll just reflect on the domestic life outdoors. In any case, I hope you enjoy. Let's ramble!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Waterdog (1)

  1. Brent says:

    The pictures of warmer days alone are sufficient to give the beginning of this series an optimistic feel. It certainly helps that I know a bit about the outcome of this story. Great idea for a mini-series!

  2. We did a project similar to this in PA. and it was great and good for the stream. I have not had a chance to fish it, as i did not fish PA last year, but after two years, this should be the year to see if it worked. JW

  3. Jack,
    I’d be interested in knowing something of the before/after on your stream project there in PA. We had a good precipitation year in ’14, so things might be really improved on your water. One thing I noticed on our project here was that the brookies moved right into the work sites once we left them for a few days. So, thanks for the reading and the comment. WF

  4. Bob Stanton says:

    Labor intensive stuff, even with mechanical help. Doubly so with manpower. But so needed and so worth it.

  5. What a cool project! I’m most impressed by the brain power of those involved to know how to manipulate the stream to achieve the effect you (and the trout) wanted. Good job!

    • Thank you, Jim. Hopefully brain power had something to do with this, and not just dumb luck. All the laboring hands got together nicely for this job, and hopefully the next two posts here will support this claim.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.